Pediatr. praxi. 2010;11(5):306-311

The present of registered HPV vaccines

doc.MUDr.Roman Chlíbek, Ph.D., MUDr.Jan Smetana, MUDr.Vanda Boštíková
Katedra epidemiologie, Fakulta vojenského zdravotnictví Univerzity obrany, Hradec Králové

Currently there are two available vaccines against human papilloma virus (HPV). Bivalent vaccine Cervarix and quadrivalent vaccine Gardasil.

Both vaccines despite the fact that they are produce by the identical recombinant technology differentiate in a number indicator.

They differ in the number and amount of antigen in the production system used for the preparation of antigens, the adjuvant system

and indication range. The uniqueness of the two vaccines is that they are the first truly anti-cancer vaccines, which have expanded the

possibilities of prevention by vaccination. Another uniqueness of HPV vaccines is significantly higher immune response to vaccination

rather than natural HPV infection. Given that the most important role in HPV protection played virus neutralisation antibodies in serum,

immunogenicity of the vaccine, high IgG antibodies production and duration of vaccine-induced protection of a key for the high efficacy

of HPV vaccination. There are the first head-to-head data comparing the two vaccines in immunogenicity, efficacy and safety. But many

questions remain in the duration of protection, in the minimal titres of protective antibody, the need for booster doses, the effect of

natural HPV infection on the production of antibodies and anamnestic role of memory B cells. The significance of HPV vaccination is to

prevent the most common and most serious diseases associated with HPV infection – cervix carcinoma.

Keywords: safety, cervical cancer, HPV, immunogenicity

Published: October 15, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chlíbek R, Smetana J, Boštíková V. The present of registered HPV vaccines. Pediatr. praxi. 2010;11(5):306-311.
Download citation

References

  1. Human Papillomaviruses. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of carcinogenic Risk to Humans. 2007: 90.
  2. zur Hausen H. Condylomata acuminata and human genital cancer. Cancer Res 1976; 36(2 pt 2): 794. Go to PubMed...
  3. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, et al. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 244-265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999; 189: 12-19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. de Sanjosé S, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, et al. World-wide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a metaanalysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2007; 7: 453-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bosch FX, Burchell AN, Schiffman M, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia. Vaccine 2008; 26(suppl. 10): K1-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Brown DR, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, et al. The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in generally HPV-naive women aged 16-26 years. J Infect Dis 2009; 199: 926-944. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Bayas JM, Costas L, Munoz A. Cervical cancer vaccination indications, efficacy, and side effects. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110: S11-S14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Aguado T, et al. HPV and cervical cancer in the world: 2007 report. Vaccine 2007; 25(Suppl. 3): C1-C230. Go to PubMed...
  10. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74-108. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Baseman JG, Koutsky LA. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J Clin Virol 2005; 32(suppl. 1): S16-S24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Doerfler D, Bernhaus A, Kottmel A, et al. Human papillomavirus infection prior to coitarche. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(5): 487.e1-487e.5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Dunne EF, Karem KL, Sternberg MR, et al. Seroprevalence of human papillomavirus type 16 in children. J Infect Dis 2005; 191: 1817-1819. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Stone KM, Karem KL, Sternberg MR, et al. Seroprevalence of human papillomavirus type 16 infection in the United States. J Infect Dis 2002; 186: 1396-1402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Schiffman M, Rodriguez AC. Heterogeneity in CIN3 diagnosis. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 404-406. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Harper DM. Currently approved prophylactic HPV vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2009; 8(12): 1663-1679. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Parkin DM, Bray F. Chapter 2: The burden of HPV-related cancers. Vaccine 2006; 24(Suppl 3): S11-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Stanley M, Lowy DR, Frazer IH. Prophylactic HPV vaccines: Underlying mechanisms. Vaccine 2006; 24S3: S3/106-S3/113. Go to original source...
  19. http://emea.europa.eu/. SPC vakcíny Cervarix a Silgard.
  20. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler CM, et al. Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from randomized control trial. Lancet 2006; 367(9518): 1247-1255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Mao C, Koutsky LA, Ault KA, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus-16 vaccine to present cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(1): 18-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Fife KH, Wheeler CM, Koutsky LA, et al. Dose-ranging studies of the safety and immunogenicity of human papillomavirus type 11 and type 16 virus-like particle candidate vaccines in young healthy women. Vaccine 2004; 22(21-22): 2943-2952. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Breitburd F, Kirnbauer R, Hubert NL, et al. Immunization with virus like particles from cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) can protect against experimental CRPV infection. J Virol 1995; 69(6): 3959-3963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Stanley M. Immune responses to human papillomavirus. Vaccine 2006; 24(Suppl 1): S16-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Carter JJ, Koutsky LA, Hughes JP, et al. Comparison of human papillomavirus types 16, 18, and 6 capsid antibody responses following incident infection. J Infect Dis. 2000; 181(6): 1911-1919. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. De Carvalho N, et al. 25th International Papillomavirus Conference (Abstract P-29.15), 2009.
  27. Giannini SL, Hanon E, Moris P, et al. Enhanced humoral and memory B cellular immunity using HPV 16/18 L VLP vaccine formulated with the MPL/aluminium salt combination (AS04) compared to aluminium salt only. Vaccine 2006; 24: 5937-5949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Schwarz TF, Spaczynski M, Schneider A, et al. HPV Study group for Adult Women. Immunogenicity and tolerability of an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted prophylactic cervical cancer vaccine in women aged 15-55 years. Vaccine 2009; 26(52): 6844-6851. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Joura EA, Kjaer SK, Wheeler CM, et al. HPV antibody levels and clinical efficacy following administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent HPV vaccine. Vaccine 2008; 26(52): 6844-6851. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Einstein MH, Baron M, Levin MJ, et al. Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of Cervarix and Gardasil human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer vaccines in healthy women aged 18-45 years. Hum Vaccine 2009; 5(10): 1-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Reisinger KS, Block SL, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Safety and persistent immunogenicity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, 18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine in preadolescents and adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007; 26: 201-209. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Petaja T, Keranen H, Karppa T, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV) -16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in healthy boys aged 10-18 years. J Adolesc Health 2009; 44: 33-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. David MP, Hardt K, Tibaldi F, et al. Long term persistence of detectable anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 antibodies induced by CERVARIX modelling of sustained antibody response. Poster on 27th ESPID, 13-17 May 2008, Graz, Austria.
  34. Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, da Rosa MI, et al. Efficacy of Human Papillomavirus Caccines- A Systematic Quantitative Review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 1166-1176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. CDC. Syncope after vaccination - United States, January 2005-July 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57: 457-460.
  36. Pedersen C, Petaja T, Strauss G, et al. Immunization of early adolescent females with human papillomavirus type 16 and 18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine containing AS04 adjuvant. J Adolesc Health 2007; 40: 564-571. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Wacholder S, et al. Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial Group. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 virus like particles vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial. JAMA 2007; 298(7): 743-753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Garland SM, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, et al. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1928-1943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Stanley M. HPV biology/immunology and vaccine technology. HPV Masterclass Europe 2008, 26.-27. 4. 2008, Warsaw, Poland (osobní sdělení). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.