Pediatr. praxi. 2015;16(2):98-102

The utility of modern diagnostic genetic methods in clinical pediatrics

MUDr.Andrea Hladíková, Ph.D., RNDr.Alfons Balcar, Mgr.Dita Černá
Oddělení lékařské genetiky FN Ostrava

Next generation sequencing (NGS) and microarray analysis are being used with increasing frequency in pediatric genetic research.

Compared with traditional „targeted“ genetic analyses that focus on a limited portion of the human genome, these methods produce

significantly larger quanties of data, increasing the potential for wide-ranging and clinically meaningful applications. Chromosomal

microarray analysis (CMA) has emerged as a new useful diagnostic method to identify genomic abnormalities associated with a wide

range of developmental delay including mental retardation, congenital malformations, cognitive and language impairment as whole as

multiple congenital abnormalities. CMA includes array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism

(SNP) arrays. Both methods are powerful for detection of genomic copy number variants (CNV) such as microdeletions or microduplications.

Genomic abnormalities occur with the highest frequency (20–25 %) in children with moderate to severe mental retardation

combined with congenital malformations or dysmorphic features. However, disease-causing CNVs are found in 5 –10 % children with

autistic spectrum disorders and atypical phenotypes.

Nowadays CMA should replace classical karyotype examination as the first-tier test for genetic evaluation of children with developmental

and behavioral delay. Potent new genetic technologies may discern important diagnostic information in this group of children and

their families.

congenital anomalies, autism.

Keywords: next generation sequencing (NGS), SNP and CGH microarray, pediatrics, developmental delay, intellectual disability, multiple

Published: June 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hladíková A, Balcar A, Černá D. The utility of modern diagnostic genetic methods in clinical pediatrics. Pediatr. praxi. 2015;16(2):98-102.
Download citation

References

  1. Schaaf CP, Wiszniewska J, Beaudet AL. Copy number and SNP arrays in clinical diagnostics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2011; 12: 25-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. General guidelines and quality assurance for cytogenetics. ECA newsletter 2012; 29: 7-25.
  3. Jalal SM, Harwood AR, Sekhon GS, et al. Utility of subtelomeric fluorescent DNA probes for detection of chromosome anomalies in 425 patients. Genetics in Medicine. 2003; 5: 28-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Seemanová E, Novotná D, Vlčková Z. Subtelomerická přestavba příčinou mikrocefalie, faciální dysmorfie a mentální retardace. Čs Ped 2007; 62(1): 48-51.
  5. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: Chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2010; 86: 749-764. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Lundvall M, Rajaei S, Erlandson A, et al. Aethiology of severe mental retardation and further genetic analysis by high-resolution microarry in population-based series of 6-to 17-year-old children. Acta Paediat 2012; 101: 8591. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Beaudet AL. The Utility of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Child Dev 2013; 84(1): 121-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Pospíšilová Š, Tichý B, Mayer J. Sekvenování lidského genomu - technologie nové generace anebo budeme rutinně sekvenovat lidské genomy? Čas Lék Čes 2009; 148: 296-302
  9. Brdička R. Genetika v klinické praxi. GHC Praha: Galén 2014: 126s.
  10. Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG, et al. Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Human Molecular Genetics. 2010; 19: 1263-1275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Veltman JA, Schoenmakers EF, Eussen BH, Janssen I, Merkx G, van Cleef B, et al. High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2002; 70: 1269-1276. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Shaw-Smith C, Redon R, Rickman L, Rio M, Willatt L, Fiegler H, et al. Microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) detects submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications in patients with learning disability/mental retardation and dysmorphic features. J Med Gen 2004; 41: 241-248. Go to original source...
  13. Ben-Shachar S, Lanpher B, German JR, Potocki L, Sreenath Nagamani S, Franco LM, et al. Microdeletion 15q13.3: A locus with incomplete penetrance for autism, mental retardation, and psychiatric disorders. J Med Gen 2009; 46: 382-388. Go to original source...
  14. Miles JH. Autism spectrum disorders - a genetics review. Genetics in Medicine. 2011; 13: 278-294. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Sanders SJ, Ercan-Sencicek AG, Hus V, Luo R, Murtha MT, Moreno-De-Luca D, et al. Multiple recurrent de novo copy number variations (CNVs), including duplications of the 7q11.23 Williams-Beuren syndrome region, are strongly associated with autism. Neuron. 2011; 70: 863-885. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Hultman CM, Sandin S, Levine SZ, Lichtenstein P, Reichenberg A. Advancing paternal age and risk of autism: New evidence from a population-based study and a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry 2010: 121: 2010. Go to original source...
  17. Betancur C. Etiological heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorders: More than 100 genetic and genomic disorders and still counting. Brain Research. 2011; 1380: 42-77. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Remschmidt H, Theisen FM. Schizophrenia and related disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Neural Transmission. Supplementa. 2005; 69: 121-141. Go to original source...
  19. Helbig I, Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, et al. 15q13.3 microdeletions increase risk of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Nature Genetics. 2009; 41: 160-162. Go to original source...
  20. Boomsma DI, Saviouk V, Hottenga JJ, Distel MA, de Moor MH, Vink JM, et al. Genetic epidemiology of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD index) in adults. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5: e10621. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Syrmou A, Tzetis M, Fryssira H, et al. Array comparative genocmi hybridization as a clinical diagnostic tool in syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital heart disease. Pediatr res 2013; 73(6): 772-776. Go to original source...
  22. Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, Pursley AN, Kang SH, Simovich MJ, et al. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2009; 29: 29-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Tarini BA, Konczal LL, Goldenberg AJ, et al. The perils of SNP microarray testing: uncovering enexpected consanguinity. Pediatr Neurol 2013; 49 1): 50-53. Go to original source...
  24. Seemanová E. Dysmorfické příznaky - klíč k diagnostice genetických poruch. Pediatr praxi 2008; 9(5): 305-308.




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.