Pediatr. praxi. 2021;22(4):268-271 | DOI: 10.36290/ped.2021.055

News in childhood pain - Part 2

prof. PhDr. Jiří Mareš, CSc.
Lékařská fakulta UK v Hradci Králové

The second part of the review study is addressed to general practitioners for children and adolescents. In its empirical part, it relies on international resources from 2014-2020. In the first section, the study is dedicated to detecting childhood pain, whether it takes the form of simple screening or a more comprehensive pain assessment. It describes the most common tools, used to measure pain intensity in preschool and school children. Backed by literature, he seeks an answer to the question of why pediatric practice is often confined to a single indicator of pain - its intensity. In the second section, the study summarizes new insightinto how the particularities of parents and their behavior affect the pain of pediatric patients. Itpresents the findings of a comparative study which concluded that if a child cannot assess their pain alone for a number of reasons, it is appropriate for their parents, not a nurse or independent assessor, to assess it. Findings on how the behaviour of parents, present in painful performance, influence their children's procedural pain are also useful for practice.

Keywords: pain, children, adolescents.

Published: October 15, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mareš J. News in childhood pain - Part 2. Pediatr. praxi. 2021;22(4):268-271. doi: 10.36290/ped.2021.055.
Download citation

References

  1. Mareš J. Novinky v problematice dětské bolesti - 1. část. Pediatr. Praxi 2021; 22(3): 173-176. Go to original source...
  2. Mareš J, et al. Dítě a bolest. Praha: Grada Publishing, 1997: 317 s.
  3. Le May S, Ballard A, Khadra C, et al. Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale. Pain 2018; 159(8): 1508-1517. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Jaaniste T, Noel M, Yee RD, et al. Why Unidimensional Pain Measurement Prevails in the Pediatric Acute Pain Context and What Multidimensional Self-Report Methods Can Offer. Children 2019; 6(132): 1-22. Dostupné na: doi:10.3390/children6120132 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Joint Commission. (2019). Pain management: Screening versus assessment - PC.01. 02.07 EP Dostupné na: https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/standard-faqs/ambulatory/ provision-of-care-treatment-and-services-pc/000002214/
  6. Hla TK, Hegarty M, Russell P, et al. Perception of Pediatric Pain: a comparison of postoperative pain assessments between child, parent, nurse, and independent observer. Pediatric Anesthesia 2014; 24(11): 1127-1131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Donnelly TJ, Palermo TM, Newton-John TR. Parent cognitive, behavioural, and affective factors and their relation to child pain and functioning in pediatric chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2020; 161(7): 1401-1419. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Schinkel MG, Chambers CT, Caes L, et al. A Comparison of Maternal versus Paternal Nonverbal Behavior During Child Pain. Pain Practice, 2017; 17(1): 41-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Brown EA, De Young A, Kimble R, et al. Review of a Parent's Influence on Pediatric Procedural Distress and Recovery. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2018; 21(2): 224-245. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Sobol-Kwapińska M, Sobol M, Wožnica-Niesobska E. Parental Behavior and Child Distress and Pain During Pediatric Medical Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Health Psychology 2020; 39(7): 558-572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Harris J, Ramelet AS, van Dijk M, et al. Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals. Intensive Care Medicine 2016; 42(6): 972-986. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Pediatrics for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.